IT Success Depends On Treating Staff As People, Not “Human Resources”

hrvetting May 9, 2013 1



by Anthony O’Donnell

insurancetech

Frank Wander, former Guardian Life Insurance Co. CIO and head of the IT Excellence Institute, dislikes “human resources” precisely because he’s passionate about managing people. His problem isn’t with the HR function itself but rather with the name, which he says reflects a deeply held belief that professionals are interchangeable parts.



“What’s in a name?” you might respond. Wander asserts that the term reflects what’s wrong with how we manage IT organizations and explains the tech industry’s appalling record of failure.

“Terms such as ‘human resources‘ and ‘human capital‘ dehumanize people who have their own thoughts, feelings, creative ideas and projects,” Wander declares. “The more highly attuned the organization is to that, the more you’ll get out of your staff. If you think of them as ‘human resources,’ you shouldn’t be surprised if you have low employee engagement scores.”

In his new book, Transforming IT Culture: How To Use Social Intelligence, Human Factors And Collaboration To Create An IT Department That Outperforms (Wiley CIO, 2013), Wander chronicles a record of technology failure. He begins with a look at the unforeseen limitations and costs of IBM’s OS/360 in 1964 and takes us up to a 2012 McKinsey study of 5,400 projects across all industries valued at more than $15 million each. McKinsey found that these projects were, on average, 45% over budget while delivering 56% less value than planned. The aggregate cost overrun was about $66 billion, and 17% of the projects actually put the company at risk.

“After programming modern computers for 50 years and with trillions of dollars of experience, we should be experts,” Wander says. The reason we aren’t is that we continue to apply industrial notions of resource and process. What may have been effective for manual and automated work doesn’t translate to knowledge work that depends on creativity and communication, he insists.

“Big projects fail more regularly, which shows how poorly connected people are in corporate environments,” Wander says. “Initiatives in large organizations require a high degree of cross-functional collaboration, and companies aren’t good at collaborating.”

Wander says he isn’t a critic but rather an advocate for a much better way of doing IT. During more than five years at Guardian, he drove between 92% and 94% of projects on time and under budget, a record characteristic of his entire career, which includes stints at Prudential and Merrill Lynch. That success is rooted in the formation of collaborative social systems, where you have “the deepest and most meaningful form of collaboration, and that only happens where there’s a high degree of trust between people,” he says.

This article was written by Anthony O’Donnel  and originally published on insurancetech

Enter Your Mail Address

One Comment »

  1. Carmen Johnson May 9, 2013 at 8:38 am - Reply

    thanks

Leave A Response »

Plugin from the creators of Brindes :: More at Plulz Wordpress Plugins